Grayscale Research Head: Crypto Industry Can Thrive Without CLARITY Act
Grayscale's Zach Pandl argues the US crypto sector can continue expanding even if the CLARITY Act fails to pass, noting significant portions already operate without comprehensive market-structure rules.
Zach Pandl, Head of Research at Grayscale, contends that the US crypto industry can advance even if the CLARITY Act is not passed into law, pointing to nearly 17 years of crypto ecosystem development without such legislation. In the absence of CLARITY, stablecoins would retain their ability to function as payment methods and Bitcoin would continue operating as a store of value, meaning the law's failure would not create immediate market disruption.
However, Pandl identifies a more significant long-term concern: the absence of comprehensive regulatory clarity could impede future innovation and investment in the US. Without clear rules governing which securities laws apply, how tokenized assets can be issued, and what obligations crypto companies face, investors and businesses may face substantial uncertainty in their decision-making.
Pandl expects that the SEC and other regulatory bodies can partially fill this gap through rulemaking. He notes that the current administration has already advanced institutional crypto custody, banking access for crypto firms, staking regulations, and exchange-traded products. Nevertheless, without comprehensive market structure rules at the legislative level, Pandl argues that a greater share of new investment may flow overseas.
Polymarket odds currently place CLARITY Act approval in 2026 at just 21%, down 44 percentage points from earlier assessments. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has argued that Congress had sufficient time to reach agreement and that further delays reflect political positioning rather than genuine drafting challenges. Pro-crypto Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, pushed for extended negotiations rather than a procedural vote before the August recess.
These two are not the same thing, and one does not produce the other. The left is how this single article reads, from its tone alone. The right is the site’s own call on the asset, from indicators and analysis. Press tone feeds no score and no signal: on the only corpus this site has measured, daily tone tracked the move that had already happened and showed no measurable link with what followed.
More on Bitcoin All pieces →
- Neutral Block Files for US National Trust Bank Charter to Consolidate Crypto Custody
- Neutral Tokenized Asset Holders Cross 3.5 Million as Institutional Inflows Rebound
- Neutral Iran Eases Currency Restrictions to Permit Cross-Border Crypto Settlements
- Neutral Block Seeks OCC Approval for Builders Bank & Trust to Manage Digital Assets
Rewritten from the headline, the teaser and the one-line summary the qualification step produced — that is all the material there is, and nothing is added to it. The source link is kept on file so any item can be checked, and is not published here.